Sundae
While I was drinking my Blue Monster, I was dreaming of a breakfast like that
pictured on Robert's
blog:
fried egg, grilled tomatoes, Canadian bacon, sausage. Add sour-dough toast
and a cup of coffee and you have heaven on a plate. The post is not about
morning people, of which I am one, but morning poets, those whom you can read
with pleasure before noon. I don't read much poetry in the morning, unless
I happen to have been reading a book the prior evening and it's sitting on the
breakfast table. This morning it was GC Waldrep's Disclamor, which
seems to be excellent at any time of day.
Didi has added Jim
Zola to her Men of the Web.
Jim is one of those people whom I feel like I've known forever. He's one
of the gaggle of online poets whom I've run into at various online poetry
boards, dating back to the time before blogs. There are dozens of people
for whom I have this fondness. Some I've emailed a zillion times, some
I've chatted on the phone for hours. In some cases, like Sweet Junie, Wem,
Frank and Ally, I've met in realspace and found them exactly as I expected.
Others, like Claudia and Tricia, I've spoken with on the phone, exchanged
birthday presents, and done everything but actually meet them. There is a
large group of people that I'm sure I've met (Suzanne, Rebecca, Seth and RJ),
but when I think about it, well, I haven't. I should rent an SUV, fill it
with poetry books, drive to Eau Claire to pick up Junie, and make a long trip
around the US visiting my poet friends. Maybe next year, or the year
after, or shortly after winning a lottery.
~~~
Googling around let me to a blog entry by
Jonathan in 2002 (how did that
happen?):
I learned a new verb today: to "rilk" is to respond to something in an
exaggeratedly sensitive way (Koch, Hotel Lambosa). It works in Spanish too: ¡Déjate
ya de rilkear! Stop rilking around already. What would other poets names mean,
as verbs? "That poet from the 1950s is certainly worth sillimanning" (rescuing
from literary oblivion in great, painstaking detail?). "He schuylered my house."
What would that mean? I'm not sure. It's worth thinking about.
I've often thought about poets in strange contexts: poets on baseball
cards, poets as animals, poets as vegetables. I rather like this idea of
poets as verbs, and would perhaps even extend the notion to include modifiers
("That poem was ashberly understandable"). I can imagine there is some
value to being Vendlered (not strictly a poet, I suppose). Others come to
mind: "I thought it was a little wordy, so I simicized it". "In
spreading himself around between publishing, speaking and advising, he's
eshlemandered the field". Of course, it gets a little confusing with poets who
already have names with grammatical import ("The verse seem rather young").
~~~
A loved one is entertaining the idea of ghostwriting. I have a
brother-in-law who does very well for himself in this line of work, but that's
really all I know about it. Apparently, top ghostwriters can make mid
6-figure salaries if engaged by top novelists or famous people bent on getting
their memoirs in print. Wikipedia states that ghostwriters are used in music
composition, which seems really odd to me (examples include everything from
classical to hip-hop). Apparently some CEOs even use ghostwriters to keep
up on their "personal blog". I don't suppose there is much money in
ghostwriting poetry, but I actually think I'd be pretty good at it. I've
written dozens of poems in the style of other poets for practice (Graham, Merwin,
Collins, WCW). I think some poets would be very difficult to ghostwrite
for, though, either because their work is blandish or because it's wildly
innovative (e.g, Dean Young).
~~~
More news from The Futility Review:
The staff have exchanged emails and decided to accept only simultaneous
submissions − if nobody else wants it, why would
we? We have also extended our submission methods beyond
e-submission and snailmail to include singing telegram. Dr. Grinnell, our
poetry editor, informed us yesterday that she has rejected several works by
Rilke and is currently reviewing Celan for rejection candidates. Ms.
Lockwood is busy reviewing a small handful of books that have not been written,
but should be. This includes a collection of paradelles by Cole Swensen,
and a small volume of verse by Casey Stengel. Ms. Meath is working on our
entry for Poet's Market, which will include the phrase "we receive
approximately 3,000 submission a year and accept none of them". Ms.
Carroll is currently engaged in copyediting whitespace.
Comments
You two are welcome here anytime! We even have a comfy bed for you. xo
Posted by: suzanne | October 7, 2007 03:19 PM
I have a ghostwriter write my blog for me.
Posted by: Rebecca Loudon | October 8, 2007 07:23 AM
Thanks, Suzanne.
Yeah, Rebecca, good idea.
Posted by: jbahr | October 10, 2007 11:28 AM
This is sad and pathetic. I used to coach Little League. One of the other coaches would have his team shout and cheer when they were losing badly. “It’s only a game,” he would tell the kids. “Who cares who wins. We all win.” What an asshole. Of course it matters who wins and who loses. This is more of the same. Maybe you are the same guy who coached that pathetic little league team. Pretending that it doesn’t matter where you get published doesn’t change the fact that it does. This is foolish and sad behavior from someone I suspect who is used to losing.
Posted by: Nimbleporcupine | October 15, 2007 06:10 PM
Actually, NP, I'm used to making good potato-leek soup. I made some tonight and it was wonderful and I considered myself a winner. I gave myself a little cheer, in fact.
Posted by: jbahr | October 16, 2007 07:12 AM