Marx and the Morpheel
Morning Treadmill: I couldn't help but notice how in the ubiquitous hit, Umbrella,
Rihanna's warbling sounds like she's channeling The Cranberries'
Dolores O'Riordan. Add a new workout show to match Hip Hop Abs
and Yoga Booty Ballet: I didn't catch the name but it has something to do
with wiggling around a dance pole. JAG is on for the 124th year in a row.
ESPN appears to have as many channels as all the TV stations we had as a kid.
Every morning this bouncy buxom redhead and her partner show us how to make
"gumball slippers" and foil-wrapped pencil holders and butterfly
appliqués and
other stuff I used to dread getting from the kids when they came home from
school projects. Reverend Creflo A. Dollar spent 25 minutes preaching on
20 words in Genesis, I kid you not (doesn't "And God said, Let there be
light: and there was light. / And God saw the light, that it was good" make God
sound like a nursery school teacher?).
Dana Gioia
describes himself as "perhaps the only person ever to get an MBA to become a
poet". Surely, that can't be so. I, for example, was two courses
away but as I was getting a doctorate in business anyway, and declined to take the
extra classes (though I did run over to the other side of campus and get an M.S.
in Computer Science). Are there any other practicing poets out there with
MBAs?
Whoda thunk? Dick Cheney is his own branch of government or his own rogue
nation or something.
Eileen has renamed her blog
Poker Poetics, which is almost an infringement of my Whimsical empire.
Also, congrats, Eileen, for getting a panel approved by AWP. I've heard
it's easier to get an audience with the Pope nowadays. I wouldn't mind
attending the prose poem panel that Ms.
Nezhukumatathil is on with Hicok, Addonizio, et al.
Josh
enjoys Venice with the same wonderment that I always have. Like
Henry, I feel crushed by indifference this week. I like these lines
from Catherine Wagner's
Macular Hole: "Well who then is saying it. Trucks in the
offing / finch on the phonewire, movement of tree".
Kristy has
Dusie chaps to trade. Knocked Up
joins
Joshua's film list.
Stephen is giving away
poetry books. Jessie
contributes a recipe for my culinary section: Green, Eggs, and Ham.
Among many other interesting notions, Kasey posits
that a poem is
competent if it tends to play well with other poems in the journal it
appears (yes, that's a simplification, read the article).
Simon
continues to amuse: "the quack medicine of Marxism is a
tool just as much as the insane, egotistical or megalomaniac, manifestos and
poems that are produced by much of the avant garde." What's interesting
is that Simon's response was motivated by Kasey's comment thread, which wandered
all over the place in interesting ways, pulling in links to other blogger's
thought, and sparking a discussion between Kent and Joshua ("Does [Flarf]
believe, with Badiou, that we shouldn't cringe at the idea of massive State
Terror after the Revolution and that certain School of Quietude Poets might well
best be sent to the guillotine?") One interesting
link (cited by Jordan) was Jonathan's
hypothesis
regarding literary context.
In any event, I probably lean more toward Simon and
Kent's view of Marxist theory as anachronistic. In the two largest
enterprises in which I had up-close-and-personal views into the machinations of
the owner-manager class, the constant goal was to get rid of people altogether.
In the best of worlds, according to this über-class,
the company would be run by computers and machinery, all of which was built by
yet more computers and machinery. No pesky unions, no expensive pensions.
I got Scientific American for 20 years and then stopped because I thought
it had gotten dumbed down, then started again because I figured I had, too.
Some interesting bits from this month's issue:
- The 1.4 billion cattle in the world contribute significantly to methane production (a putative contributor to global warming), perhaps 115 million metric tons per year. There were far fewer ruminants in pre-industrial days (which included 60 million American bisons) that contributed an estimated 10 million metric tons of methane.
- The oily seeds of the jatropha plant, native to Mali and Tanzania, may be the ideal source of biofuel. The plant favors hot, dry climates, and could benefit developing countries with large areas of semi-arid land.
- The Memjet, a radically advanced ink-jet printer, is tiny and prints color photographs up to 30 times faster than conventional printers. Developed by Silverbrook Research in Australia, the Memjet heats ink to a boil and fires it through nozzles.
- Ray guns may be real soon. The Defense Department's High-Energy Laser Joint Technology Office is testing a laser gun whose high energy could knock down incoming "mortars, artillery shells, rockets and missiles".
- A species of fish in a Turkish hot spring have adapted to feed off the skin of the tourists who use the spring for therapy.
- Go is one of the few games that have eluded mastery by computers (IBM's Deep Blue beat Gary Kasparov at chess in 1997). A new algorithm by a pair of Hungarian researchers may change all that.
- The Skeptic debunks The Secret, a book on positive thinking lauded by Oprah.
- Human-induced climate and hydrological change is likely to compel hundreds of millions of people to relocate in the next few decades.
- Creationist argue that DNA is so complicated and so dependent upon (the very differently constructed) proteins that the whole system could not have evolved without divine intervention. Robert Shapiro believes that a simpler self-replicating chemical precursor is the answer.
- Modern anesthetics work by not quite killing you. New anesthetic regimes will attempt to target individual human systems.
- Conservation biologists have proposed a "bold
plan" to repopulate America (specifically the Dakotas) with the animals
similar to
those that humans wiped out in the Pleistocene: lions, elephants,
horses, and camels.
Zelda
Update: I'm stuck trying to beat Morpheel in the Lakebed Temple. I'm
bringing the Wii over to Cath's tomorrow, though, so Ky and Der can use their
long experience and amazing reaction times to get me through a couple of Bosses.
Here's the only poem I every wrote that mentions Scientific American,
called Western Devolution:
Your phone call caught me reading Scientific American. They say
each star attracts a twin, too dim to see. Ours moves an arc-second
every other generation -- out beyond the Oort Cloud, rustling among
the comets-to-be, no tidal pull, no evidence beyond the second
order effects, dark and faithful to ellipsis.
~~~
There are only the geese
in the air and those beneath
the sugar mill, arranged like an army
of the mute: frozen mud, stubbled
wheat. Above, a lancehead caroms
off the horizon, returning with the same
aimless determination. They say
it’s a thing in their head and the iron
hidden in Long’s Peak.
~~~
Two men meet
in a cowboy bar,
one bleeding from
a razor cut, the other
with his hat on backwards.
~~~
The moon is hubris.
No sea to sway, a eunuch
singing to the stone.
~~~
In an uncharacteristic paroxysm of self-promotion, I have added the Court
Green poems to my
web page.
See you tomorrow. Sweet Junie is back in Wisconsin and I have time on my
hands.
Comments
Doesn't Eileen Tabios have an MBA?
Posted by: reb | June 22, 2007 08:19 PM
Hey Jeffrey--I have an MBA with double major in economics and international business from NYU.
I always joke that I always thought that to be a poet I first had to be a banker. Like T.S. Eliot, I once was a British banker...though he was with Barclays and I was with National Westminster Bank.
(I always like the dry/wry wit I sense permeating through your blog posts...I'd insert a smiley here but don't know how...)
cheers,
Eileen
Posted by: Eileen | June 23, 2007 07:33 AM
Thanks, Reb for mentioning Eileen and thanks Eileen for confirming. I figured there had to be some more MBA's out there. Come to think of it, Victoria Chang was in business . . . I wonder if she had an MBA?
Regards,
J
Posted by: jbahr | June 24, 2007 07:05 AM
Victoria Chang does have an MBA.
Congrats on Court Green. I love that mag.
Posted by: Jilly | June 24, 2007 12:34 PM
Hey, not to get too technical, but: if the "owner-manager class" gets rid of all the workers, where will their profit come from? They'll just buy each other's stuff? I don't have a business degree or anything, but if owners have to outlay all the fixed capital (infrastructure and raw materials), and they have to do all the consumption spending as well, my math says they go out of business pretty quick.
It's certainly true that capital wants to minimize variable costs of production (labor). But there are still two places profit comes from: getting more labor value out of your workers than you're paying them for, or selling things for more than they're worth in materials+labor+infrastructure.
So even if some owners decide they doesn't need their workers, they sure as shootin' still need there to be a laboring class that consumes without taking a significant share of capital profit beyond their wages. Unless of course we just start printing money freely. I hear that has downstream flaws.
I challenge you to show me the economic math by which this structure is "anachronistic"; do it and I'll send you one book of my choice, but if you can't, you send me one. Deal?
Posted by: jane | July 13, 2007 02:08 PM