Cain's Wife
I was sweeping out my garage and the UPS guy showed up and asked me if I was
21. That means wine. But, I haven't bought any wine online for a
while. Still, there it was, 6 bottles of California Cabernet Sauvignon.
I never order 6 of anything. Maybe it's a birthday present. Nah,
nobody likes me that much. Maybe it's an order screw-up, since I think
I've gotten wine from this firm before. Maybe it's like winning the
lottery in a diminutive sense.
I googled "Cain's Wife" on a whim and found something like 13,000 hits. It
turns out that that (don't you love it when two words juxtapose like that
legitimately?) radical liberal ACLU-sponsored spawn of Satan, Clarence
Darrow, also used the Cain's wife argument to cast doubt on the literal
interpretation of the Bible. I mean, if Seth was Adam and Eve's third
child, and he arrived 130 years into Mankind's Reign on Earth, and Cain was
wed B4 he murdered his brother, and the residents of the Land of Nod
had to have been children of Adam who wandered off much later, and ... Oh,
I don't know, it's like trying to create a chronology on CSI: Somewhere.
In any event, that doesn't prevent thousands of Christian conservative sites
from Dealing With The Whole Cain's Wife Issue by hypothesizing who left for Nod
when, and explaining how the incest prohibitions didn't come into play until
Leviticus, and BTW, Adam and Eve's genetic structure was pristine, so this whole
brother-sister consummation thing is OK, nobody was going to have a baby with
six fingers. Sometimes religion hits me and I just don't know what to do
with it. I don't mean The Troubles or the War of the Roses or the
Hindu-Islamic contentions in India, most of which I figure is variant of the
Jets and the Sharks, although they do tend to end up with large number of dead
bodies. But it always seems like a Clash of Cultures, much like the
problems that arise when somebody dances to his iPod while holding a subway
strap while somebody else is trying to read Proust in her seat. Or worse,
when somebody says they've been dissed in the ghetto, or perhaps on an NFL
gridiron. At what point did we get so fucking touchy? I totally
understand when there is a shortage of resources and your crops just failed and
your child is dying and, in general, life isn't about worrying how Lindsay Lohan
is going make it in rehab. It's just that I don't understand in theory,
why people kill each other for stupid reasons. The problem is that I'm old
enough to know that that's not why people get killed. It's a conflict
among world-views, more precisely a clash of comfort zones, a pressing desire to
preserve exactly the screwed-up mythologies that you grew up with, otherwise how
could life be worth living?
I watched the same
Prairie Home
Companion movie that Ange reviewed recently. I like PHC in
general, and listen to it about as often as The Car Guys, which is once a month
maybe. I like Guy Noir and love when Sue Scott and Tim Russell do
vignettes. Also the Sound Guy, who used to be somebody and is now somebody
else. In the movie were some of my favorite actors, including Meryl Streep
and Lily Tomlin. Anyway, the problems with the movie: Kevin Kline
played Kevin Kline in his role as Guy Noir, as if this were a remake of the Pink
Panther. The whole shtick where everybody reminisces too much got old
after 5 minutes. Woody Harrelson and John C. (Mr. Cellophane) Reilly were
bad choices as the cowboys. Lindsay Lohan was a distraction. Tommy
Lee Jones played in character, but was too late to offer up any kind of
redemption. Everybody else was great, including Scott and Russell as
backstage do-bees. Here was the chance for GK to interpret the
authenticity of PRC to something understandable by Coastal Folk, and he chose
the easy, schmaltzy way out.
I had a very good and earnest mathematician speak to me in squigglies for almost
two hours today. Somewhere in there were thetas and Laplace equations of
order N and rotations in polar coordinates and dot products and imaginary
numbers and irrational numbers. All of these led up to a practical need to
do something which I will be doing, but I didn't actually have to know the
details to do it. What is that like? Maybe like proving that you're
the same tribe as your benefactors, like being to able to conduct the mass in
Latin.
Yeah, it's still cold. No, we haven't gotten rid of the piles of snow yet.
I might as well live in North Dakota.
Comments
Re: "but I didn't actually have to know the details to do it."
This seems to me to be the place where technical interest intersects artistic interest. I'm fascinated by details on technical issues and I often reread poems 5 or 6 times to find something I missed the last time through. In my own technical work, I often start from the outside in (cartoon, schematic, approach, solution); I attack writing in a similar (though cruder) way (idea, list of images/phrases, poem).
Do you find any similarities in the way you approach technical problems and the way you approach new writing?
Posted by: David | January 20, 2007 06:47 AM
Hi, David. I'm not sure it works out that well when I approach unusual artistic work as I might technical stuff. The former seems to require a degree of abandonment.
Posted by: jbahr | January 25, 2007 09:54 AM