The Mystery of Housing Starts
I didn't notice until today that Pynchon has another book out. I never
did finish Mason & Dixon, but maybe I'll give
this a go.
I was just reading Joshua's
piece
on the relationship between mobile technology and property values.
Fascinating, as always.
Speaking of property values: No one has explained to me why there is so
much new housing. After all, houses aren't like cars . . . they last the
better part of a century in most cases (Junie's house was built in 1936).
Even in this construction slowdown, the forecasts are for another 1.5 million
homes to be built. This includes both apartments, townhouses, and houses.
The population of the US is roughly 295 million and the average household size
is 2.6 persons. That means there's about 115 million households (with
roughly one-third renting and two-thirds owning). The population grows by
about 2.3 million people per year, or about about 900,000 households. So
we must be building 600,000 more homes a year than there are new people to live
in them. Presumably, that's because 600,000 existing homes per year either
disappear (think Katrina) or become undesirable for some reason. I wonder
where they go?
There's a certain poetry in my work, at times: "The
Ethernet controller handles a nibble of dribbling bits if the receive frame
terminates as non-octet aligned ..."
The prose section of Poetry consists of monographs, reviews and letters
to the editor (at least). Clive James rambles nicely in Listening for
the Flavor, mentioning along the way Frost, of whom he says: " I ...
find his easy-seeming, usually iambic, conversational forward flow is a
deception, a way of not just bringing the show-stopping moments to your
attention but of moving them past your attention ...", which I thought
was astute. Hooray for Christina Pugh who says "Where is the humor in the
geography of contemporary American poetry?" She notes that Halliday,
Ashbery and (Dean) Young often make her laugh out loud, and why not? God
forbid that we all conform to the poetic model of teen angst that non-readers of
poetry are quite certain we poets all still wallow in (somebody can rewrite that
so that it doesn't end on a preposition). Brian Phillips does Eight Takes.
Since receiving a nastygram from Dan Chiasson last year, I'll limit my treatment
to direct quotes.
Paul Muldoon: "Horse Latitudes is simply a splendid book,
full of deep wit, intelligent form, and Muldoon's usual crafty uncertainties".
Charles Wright: "At this point, let's face it, a new book by
Charles Wright ... isn't going to sneak up on anyone".
Nathaniel Mackey: "It isn't possible ... to say much about the elaborate
unfolding project of ... Splay Anthem ... // .. both deal with the same
recurrent themes of music, death, rebirth, history, culture and travel".
Mark Levine: "Enola Gay was one of the best collections by a
young poet ... in the past decade ... // ...Now, Levine has published his third
collection of poems, and . . has managed his most surprising trick yet: he
has written a boring book".
Major Jackson: "What I like about ... Jackson's book in general (Hoops)
is the confidence with which it merges inner-city black American milieu with a
high-art aesthetic tradition ...".
Jennifer Michael Hecht (Funny): "But, it isn't funny,
Professor".
Djuna Barnes: "Djuna Barnes is one of those small, sharp points of
vividness ..."
Dandy Dan Chiasson comes in for a drubbing in the Letters to the Editor for his
"mocking dismissal" of all of Hirshfield's work. Conservative critic Adam
Kirsch is told he misses a major point about how Ginsberg's views are informed
by Buddhism. Our own CDY has returned "no less than six times" to read D.
A. Powell's poetry from the September issue.
More tomorrow on jubilat.
Comments
You can't let yourself be intimidated by nastygrams from Dan!
Posted by: Jeannine | December 7, 2006 10:56 AM
You're so right, Jeannine!
Posted by: jbahr | December 12, 2006 06:53 AM