Unkennable
Have you ever read or heard a simple fact that you'd read or heard countless
times, and stopped and considered what it meant and that you would only think
you understood what it meant, that you would never actually ever grasp it?
Our galaxy is home to 200-400 billion stars, a few of them with solar systems,
most
without. That means that every person on earth could have 30 stars to call
their own. Our galaxy is large beyond comprehension. To get from one
side to the other at the speed of light would take 100,000 years. To get
an idea how long that is, consider that Homo sapiens first colonized
Eurasia and Oceania only 40,000 years ago, that recorded history in any sense is
less than 10,000 years old. Most scientists believe that we will never
travel outside our galaxy. Ever. (we may be able to deploy quantum
state separation or folded space or other wild phenomena to communicate or send
small inorganic objects somewhere, but even that is doubtful). The center
of our galaxy is believed to contain a supermassive black hole that has already
consumed millions, perhaps billions, of stars. Of the hundreds of billions
of stars that still remain, billions of them hold planets within their
gravitational grip. Of these planets, millions of them could be have the
properties (distance from their star, mass, composition) amenable to supporting
life. A couple of weeks ago I saw the Milky Way in a moonless sky and was
considering the unthinkably vast nature of our galaxy. Then the fact hit
me: there are another 100 billion galaxies in the universe.
What started me thinking about this was an attempt to acquaint myself with
websites other than my own. I started with my former blogroll and branched
out and branched out. I know there are more websites than I could visit in
a lifetime, but every one seems so accessible, so immediate, that the illusion
persists.
The Gallery of Regrettable
Food chronicles the history of unwise culinary choices and ludicrous
cookbooks, like "When
It's Strictly Stag", which recommends pistachio cordials to match the ties,
coffee cups and salad of the 50's guy guests. A gaggle of tiki-handled
cups sits beside a casserole pan of beans that provide the leguminous base for a
dozen erect hotdogs. Fuck This
Website is hosted by a photographer who made up stickers with the word
"Fuck" in various sizes, applied them to dozens of signs around the city, and
shot pics of the effect. The resulting coffee table book made it to #6 on
the LA Times Bestsellers List. This
site explains the rules
of "Strip Chess". How to
kill termites with armies of nematodes. Elephant polo in
Thailand.
It's endless, really.
Luckily, the right part of my brain is still a poet. It's trying to find
new metaphors for the moon. It knows that love is also unkennable.
Comments
"Have you ever read or heard a simple fact that you'd read or heard countless times, and stopped and considered what it meant and that you would only think you understood what it meant, that you would never actually ever grasp it?"
Yep. The big one for me that I never can wrap my brain around is: "Everyone dies."
I know it, but I don't really know it. I don't live as if it's true. Every once in a while, it hits me and I panic, and then it fades.
I'm like a perpetual teenager. It can never happen to me! (Or anyone I know.)
Posted by: Julie Carter | August 14, 2006 10:54 AM
Dear Dr. Bahr: From time to time, your blog seems to address many
various, sundry and esoteric authors, journals, periodicals and poetic peripherals, that one would think there is no end to how well read you
are in the subject and how wide your knowledge must be of all the various parameters that outline the current status quo of the art. So, I was wondering if you have yet read the recent article entitled "Dead Poets' Anxiety" that appears on page 65 of the latest issue of the Discover Magazine. You can't miss it; it's the one with the Einstein portrait on the cover.
The point is well summarized in the first few lines: "Poets who committed suicide were much more likely to have used first person singular references like "I," "me," and "my" and fewer first person plural words like "we," "us", and "our" in their poems than did nonsuicidal poets, according to a study published in 2001 in the Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine."
The article goes on to give prime examples by Sylvia Plath who committed suicide at the age of 30 in 1963 and another by her contemporay, Denise Levertov, who died of natural causes at the age of 74 in 1997.
Your exceedingly informed bloggage on this matter could be of decisive interest to more than a few of your faithful patronage. Do you feel or believe there is any truth to the premise that one can portend the eventuality of a premature demise based on the plurality of the pronouns employed in verse, prose or poetic?
Respectfully submitted,
JonDLarr
Posted by: JonDLarr | August 19, 2006 09:02 PM
You hang in there, Julie.
Jon: Wow, I'm inclined to drop the first person altogether in all future prose and poetry. I haven't read the article, but thanks for the recommendation.
Posted by: jbahr | August 24, 2006 10:10 AM